header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 159, Issue 7376

02 July 2009
IN THIS ISSUE

R (on the application of E) v Governing Body of the Jews Free School and others (The United Synagogue intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 626, [2009] All ER (D) 260 (Jun)

Jivraj v Hashwani Hashwani v Jivraj [2009] EWHC 1364 (Comm), [2009] All ER (D) 272 (Jun)

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage

Part one: Consumer insurance law reform is long overdue, says Peter J Tyldesley

Simon Young advocates a tripartite approach to essential cost cutting

Implied terms are back in the spotlight,
says Alison Mayfield

Alan Owens predicts a long wait if the UK is to adopt a class action regime

Part one: Consumer insurance law reform is long overdue, says Peter J Tyldesley

Raw economics, not lack of dedication, will force lawyers to consider their commitment to legal aid,
says Carol Storer

Despite careful drafting, easements can be a ripe source of dispute, says Sue Highmore

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll