Charles Pigott
Professional support lawyer
Charles Pigott, professional support lawyer, Mills & Reeve LLP. (charles.pigott@mills-reeve.com; www.mills-reeve.com)
Professional support lawyer
Charles Pigott, professional support lawyer, Mills & Reeve LLP. (charles.pigott@mills-reeve.com; www.mills-reeve.com)
Charles Pigott on how the courts are applying the For Women Scotland ruling
As the Bill nears the end of its journey in the Lords, Charles Pigott predicts its future
Whistleblowing protection is inching forward with judicial help, writes Charles Pigott—but reform is still needed
Could a recent ruling plug the gap in remedies for trade union detriment claims? Charles Pigott considers the scope of the Blacklisting Regulations
Charles Pigott outlines key employment measures contained within the government’s Employment Rights Bill
The ruling in the group action against the retailer paves the way for more claimants in the retail sector & beyond, writes Charles Pigott
How is Labour planning to make work pay? Charles Pigott examines the planned changes to employment policy under the new government
Where does the Supreme Court’s decision in Mercer leave us in terms of the law on union-related detriment? Charles Pigott reports
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace
Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire
Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard
Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office
Pillsbury—Steven James
Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire
NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
