header-logo header-logo

Will the English courts still be top choice post-Brexit, asks Jonathan Harris QC

The government must act soon to protect London as a litigation hub, says Ed Crosse

Michael Zander QC reviews the written cases of the government & the lead claimants in next week’s Supreme Court hearing

What did the pro-Brexit peers suggest? Michael Zander QC looks back at the House of Lords’ post-referendum debate

Christopher Hutton & Aniko Adam examine the implications of Brexit for UK competition law

    Article 50: an incorrect concession? Nicholas Strauss QC proposes an alternative line of attack

    Lord Chancellor criticised for slow response to attacks on judicial independence

    Show
    10
    Results
    Results
    10
    Results

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

    DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

    Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

    Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

    Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

    Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

    Ellisons—Marion Knocker

    Ellisons—Marion Knocker

    Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

    NEWS
    he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
    Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
    Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
    A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
    An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
    back-to-top-scroll