header-logo header-logo

Legal services

Subscribe

Martin Rackstraw weighs up jury eligibility issues and the arguments for the removal of potential bias in juries

Dean & Dean v Grinina [2008] EWHC 927, [2008] All ER (D) 64 (May)

R v L [2008] EWCA Crim 973, [2008] All ER (D) 66 (May)

Timothy Millett reviews the EU's high-speed reference procedure

News

Why is the number of vehicle diminution claims rising? And how are they assessed? Anthony Johnson reports

Jennifer James turns the tables on her judicial colleagues…and exposes some idiosyncrasies of the system

Removal of Executor

WSPA, BUAV and Advocates for Animals v Bowman (Unreported) January 2008

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll