header-logo header-logo

HMRC to crack down on London lawyers’ tax evasion

Peter Vaines rounds up the latest developments in the world of tax

Adam Craggs analyses HMRC’s latest defeat in the First-tier Tribunal

Clive Sheldon QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation

Peter Vaines rounds up the latest developments in the world of tax

Richard Lang follows the winding path of the Yukos v Russia case

Jonathan Fisher QC & Kate Balmer tackle mediation in larger scale tax cases

Peter Vaines breaks down the Gaines-Cooper case & provides an update on other taxing matters

Peter Vaines reports on the inevitable failure of HMRC’s revised litigation strategy

When does the First-tier Tribunal have a supervisory jurisdiction, ask Charles Brasted & Jamie Potter

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll