header-logo header-logo

New Law Journal | The leading weekly legal magazine

Home Login E-newsletter About us
Latest
Opinion
19 September 2025 / David Regan
Issue: 8131 / Categories: Features , Coronial law , Inquests
printer mail-detail

Book review: Coroners’ Investigations and Inquests (Second Edition)

230020

“Its practical focus will remain most useful to the less specialist advocate, but it is has much to offer the more seasoned practitioner”

  • Editors: Rose Harvey-Sullivan, James Weston, Jasmine Leng, and Richard Baker KC
  • Publisher: LexisNexis Butterworths
  • ISBN: 9781474333269
  • RRP: £175.00

Coroners’ Investigations and Inquests is the second edition of a work originally published in 2021. Edited by a team of barristers from 7 Bedford Row, it is explicitly aimed at practitioners representing interested persons in coronial investigations, and is intended to be accessible and practical. Its scope ranges well beyond the inquest itself to many aspects of the coronial investigation, from its commencement all the way through to applications for judicial review and reports to prevent future deaths. It is logically and thoughtfully subdivided by topic and, supported by a good index, is readily accessible, providing both commentary and, in an appendix, the most important of the relevant statutory materials.

Pithy & practical

The volume has grown in size since the first edition, and while shorter than some alternatives, it is of sufficient length for its intended purposes. Despite the number of contributors, it is cohesively written, with a practical focus. Excerpts from case law remain generally succinct and to the point. The intended readership being legal practitioners, the balance of the material covered naturally leans heavily towards topics more central to the role of the advocate. Issues of more specific concern to coroners, such as notification and certification, are quickly covered. This leaves room for the discussion of issues commonly faced by the advocate at inquest, together with a number of ancillary issues such as costs, funding and publicity.

Among its strengths are the pithy chapters on particular types of inquest—from mental health, clinical and prison deaths to less frequently explored issues of product-related death and military inquests. These are sensibly chosen, helpfully structured, and will assist the practitioner by setting out the current state of the law and offering advice on commonly encountered issues—such as considerations of risk management in cases of deaths in custody, or the deceased’s mental capacity where a death has occurred following clinical treatment. For those new to these types of inquest, this will be invaluable. Even more seasoned practitioners will benefit from standing back and looking afresh at these questions thematically.

The second edition provides useful additional chapters on inquests concerned with maternity, the police and social care contexts. The key developments in the law relating to the application of the European Convention on Human Rights are covered in a helpful and accessible manner, and there is reference to recent material including the chief coroner’s guidance for coroners on the bench, published in January.

Wider questions

There are inevitably times when such a practical style can have its limitations. Wider questions, such as the principles behind the construction of the present statutory architecture, are identified more through their application than their origin. Thus, the section on the requirement to empanel a jury in inquests arising from reportable deaths helpfully lists them, without discussing the piecemeal way the law has developed, which would inform submissions on the coroner’s discretion to sit with a jury, where not mandated to do so. Similarly, there is reference to the questioning of witnesses, and in particular the guidance provided by the Bar Standards Board and others to avoid hostile and aggressive questioning, published in 2021, without much discussion of it. The experience of coroners is all too often that questioning of witnesses who are themselves affected by the circumstances of the death can be unnecessarily and insensitively robust, sometimes seeking to trespass on areas outside of the scope of the investigation. The work rightly identifies the fact that no one within an inquest is on trial, least of all the deceased, but would benefit from a more explicit exploration of what the right to ‘examine’ a witness actually means, and most particularly that there is neither a right nor a duty to conduct a cross-examination.

All in all, Coroners’ Investigations and Inquests is an accessible and up to date revision of a useful work. Its practical focus will remain most useful to the less specialist advocate, but it is has much to offer the more seasoned practitioner. 


Reviewer: David Regan, HM Assistant Coroner, South Wales Central Coroner’s Area. Newlawjournal.co.uk

 

FEATURES
Renters’ Rights regs; dismissal to pay more; new financial remedies guide; Court of Appeal on kicking off
Joel Heap & Sam Pringle on how the Supreme Court ruling in Zedra provides clarity for corporate lawyers, minority shareholders & directors

Could a split model improve settlement outcomes in financial remedy cases, ask Rachel Frost-Smith & Lauren Guiler

Mike Somekh on the unintended effects of leasehold reform on resident‑controlled freeholds

Nick Smallwood weighs up the legal reality of social media bans: what would they mean for platforms, parents & regulators?

Nicholas Dobson examines the vindication of two officers who took action against the Police Federatio

AI has transformed the nature of cyber threats & also widened their audience: Jess Chan weighs up systems failures & erosion of trust
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explores the growing complexity of drug misuse in family proceedings and why a clearer understanding of the main drug groups is essential for legal professionals

English law assumes human arbitrators, but AI decision-makers may have a role to play, writes Daniel Kessler

Helpful assistant or laden with unknown traps? Ruth Pratt considers recent thoughts on AI for lawyers
View All

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

Meet our legal trainees
NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
MOST READ
back-to-top-scroll