header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 165, Issue 7674

28 October 2015
IN THIS ISSUE

Stolt Kestrel BV v Sener Petrol Denizcilik Ticaret AS; CDE S.A. v Sure Wind Marine Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1035, [2015] All ER (D) 146 (Oct)

JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov [2015] UKSC 64, [2015] All ER (D) 175 (Oct)

United States of America v Nolan [2015] UKSC 63, [2015] All ER (D) 183 (Oct)

Transport for London v Uber London Ltd and others [2015] EWHC 2918 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 137 (Oct)

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska report on some recent wills & probate cases

The family courts are in turmoil, says Caroline East

Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council v KW (by her litigation friend) and others [2015] EWCA Civ 1054, [2015] All ER (D) 176 (Oct)

AH (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening)[2015] EWCA Civ 1003, [2015] All ER (D) 145 (Oct)

Alistair Kinley considers contributions, qualifications & costs

Grupo Hospitalario Quiron SA v Departamento de Sanidad del Gobierno Vasco and another C-552/13 , [2015] All ER (D) 205 (Oct)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll