header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 167, Issue 7729

13 January 2017
IN THIS ISSUE

Reverend Canon Pemberton v Right Reverend Richard Inwood UKEAT/0072/16/BA, [2016] All ER (D) 80 (Dec)

Siddiqui v University of Oxford [2016] EWHC 3150 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 57 (Dec)

Roderick Ramage explains why life assurance & automatic enrolment might be bad for you

    Kateb v Howard de Walden Estates Ltd and another [2016] EWCA Civ 1176, [2016] All ER (D) 42 (Dec)

     

    David Burrows discusses anonymity for children & others involved in family proceedings in his final article on contempt

    Art 127 to be focus of new Brexit High Court case

    Show
    10
    Results
    Results
    10
    Results

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

    NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

    From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

    DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

    DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

    DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

    Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

    Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

    Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

    NEWS
    As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes
    A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike
    From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

    Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

    How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
    back-to-top-scroll