header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 7815

02 November 2018
IN THIS ISSUE

Shred, store, or secure? Matthew Kay & Natasha Adom tackle the archiving conundrum

Carry on testing; lawyer bypass regrets; better reception likely.

Accountable Care Organisations: a new model for the provision of health & social care? Nicholas Dobson reports

Does ENRC represent a missed opportunity for legal professional privilege, asks Tom Dane

It’s time for schools to reflect on the discriminatory nature of excluding children with special educational needs, says Olivia Wybraniec

Michel Reznik reports on recommendations by the Treasury Committee for the creation of a Financial Services Tribunal

In Justice Week, David Greene shows how the crisis in crime is reflected to particular areas of practice in civil justice

​A series of recent decisions provide important guidance for litigators over securing fees when a client goes bust, says Grania Langdon-Down

Ongoing uncertainty around Brexit perceived as a negative factor

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll