header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 157, Issue 7269

19 April 2007
IN THIS ISSUE

Nicholas Bevan considers the treatment of personal injury claims in the final article of the 44th update to the CPR

R v DPP [2007] All ER (D) 50 (Mar)

How do the rules relating to mitigation of loss apply to leases? Sebastian Kokelaar explains

Nova Productions Ltd v Mazooma Games Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 219, [2007] All ER (D) 234 (Mar)

Ordinary claims, Defamation claims, Group litigation, Public interest challenges

McKinnon v Government of the USA and another, Hurstanger Ltd v Wilson and another

Criminal Justice Act 2003 - Dangerous and confused? Bad character - identification issues and harsh words, Drink, guns and mobile phones, Pre-charge bail powers

The insolence of some lawyers leaves the Insider aghast

The Iran hostage debacle has punctured the image of our service personnel, says Elliot Gold

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll