header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 161, Issue 7469

08 June 2011
IN THIS ISSUE

James Hayden reports on efforts to add boardroom equality to the agenda

Organisations need to adapt their business processes to avoid breaching the Bribery Act, says Greg Wildisen

Ridgeland Properties Ltd v Bristol City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 649, [2011] All ER (D) 292 (May)

R (on the application of Shoesmith) v Ofsted and others [2011] EWCA Civ 642, [2011] All ER (D) 293 (May)

W (by her litigation friend, B) v M (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and others [2011] EWHC 1197 (COP), [2011] All ER (D) 08 (Jun)

Re L (a child) (injury: fact finding) [2011] EWHC 1285 (Fam), [2011] All ER (D) 57 (May)

Vehicle & Operator Services Agency v Wright [2011] EWHC 1389 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 09 (Jun)

R (on the application of Bashir) v Independent Adjudicator and others [2011] EWHC 1108 (Admin)

Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Conarken Group Ltd; Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Farrell Transport Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 644, [2011] All ER (D) 288 (May)

Parker Rhodes Hickmotts Solicitors v Legal Services Commission [2011] EWHC 1323 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 10 (Jun)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll