header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 161, Issue 7469

08 June 2011
IN THIS ISSUE

The advent of ABSs has knocked the referral fee debate off the front page, says David Greene

In a new NLJ mini series, Roger Smith puts human rights under the spotlight

Nicholas Dobson considers the privacy v freedom of expression conflict in light of Mosley

John McMullen reflects on what’s reasonable in unfair dismissal cases

Camilla Lovell-Hoare examines the complexities of surrogacy

Let’s go & fly this regulatory kite…but carefully, says Mike Willis

Keith Patten investigates the possibility of seeking PI damages from a parent company

Is negotiation the best course of action in development disputes, asks Christopher Stoner QC

Daniel Curran reports on the complexities of cross border searches

Peter Vaines solves the mysteries of what constitutes “full-time work abroad” & celebrates the renaissance of the Ramsay doctrine

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll