header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 161, Issue 7476

27 July 2011
IN THIS ISSUE

Halsbury's Law Exchange blogger Simon Hetherington reports on the inspection of Tinsley House immigration centre

Jon Robins investigates the latest challenges to hit clinical negligence lawyers

Dominic Regan wades into the debate over referral fees

Stephen Hockman QC returns to the controversy of privacy, parliament & the courts

Ian Smith enters into the tussle between employment law & human rights

Mariko Wilson & Kim Beatson examine financial relief following marital breakdown in an overseas jurisdiction

Rehana Azib reviews recent developments in personal injury claims

Elizabeth Cooke & Colin Oakley shed some light on the Law Commission’s project on appurtenant rights

When does the First-tier Tribunal have a supervisory jurisdiction, ask Charles Brasted & Jamie Potter

Dr Ann Brady considers the role of mediation across the EU

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll