header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 162, Issue 7524

24 July 2012
IN THIS ISSUE

Jon Robins canvasses opinion on the post-LASPO future

Should the SFO rush in to prosecute banks over LIBOR, asks David Corker

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter discuss the correct approach to apportioning discrimination awards

Geraldine Morris on the approach to religion in family proceedings

How should the courts apply the Manual Handling Operations Regulations, asks Keith Patten

Richard Hinton explains the buzz around SearchFlow’s new website

Conserving history or restricting the future? Dean Bedford puts the National Trust under the spotlight

Dermot Keating & Monica Stevenson consider how unfair commercial practices are prosecuted

Tom Morrison returns with his quarterly review of the world of information law

Caroline Kehoe & Joanne Keillor examine the consequences of an endeavours obligation on a long term contract

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll