header-logo header-logo

Employment

Subscribe

Part 1: Consulting on redundancy & TUPE transfers by Dr John McMullen

Ian Smith examines religious & philosophical conundrums & provides some light relief

Professor Mark Hill QC & Spencer Keen investigate a legal minefield

Rad Kohanzad examines the dents in the Norton Tool principle

Ian Smith plays by the rules…& ends the year with a twist

Melanie Adams examines employment related legislation announced in the Queen’s Speech

Sara Khoja considers the territorial scope of UK employment law

Ian Smith notches up a century at the coalface

A commonsense approach is plane obvious, says Dan McCauley

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter consider the complexities of sham employment terms & the true nature of the contractual relationship

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS
As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes
A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll