header-logo header-logo

Professional negligence

Subscribe

David Locke reviews the matter of informed consent, post Montgomery

What test of damages should apply in a case involving concurrent causes of action, asks Helen Mulcahy​

Daniel Goodkin examines the pitfalls surrounding valuers’ negligence

Montgomery is the belated obituary, not the death knell, of medical paternalism, says Charles Foster

Adrian Kwintner reviews causation defences in mortgage lender claims

Barbara Hewson highlights some recent trends in reproductive rights

Simon Love assesses the proposed new role for SRA Compensation Fund

Adrian Kwintner puts the art of property valuation under the spotlight

Keith Patten applauds a holistic approach to negligence liability

Susan Brown highlights the potential conflicts of interest surrounding ABSs, insurers & motor claims

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll