Verbose but unambiguous. David O’Brien discusses S 14A & the parameters of limitation
Lawyers tell woeful tales about insurers unjustly prolonging litigation but experts can delay proceedings too, says David Locke
What constitute ‘basic requirements’ in respect of history & clinical examination? Dr David Levy considers the evidence
The Supreme Court has confirmed that a professional adviser’s liability is limited to those matters on which they were asked to advise, say Elisabeth Mason & David Niven
As the Court of Appeal widens the application of the Montgomery consent test, Philippa Luscombe explores the implications for claimants
David Locke reviews the matter of informed consent, post Montgomery
What test of damages should apply in a case involving concurrent causes of action, asks Helen Mulcahy
Daniel Goodkin examines the pitfalls surrounding valuers’ negligence
Montgomery is the belated obituary, not the death knell, of medical paternalism, says Charles Foster
Adrian Kwintner reviews causation defences in mortgage lender claims
Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer
Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%
Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices