header-logo header-logo

Judges’ notes vulnerable to disclosure

01 September 2017
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Data protection guidance for judges is to be reviewed and updated in the autumn, writes Stephen Gold in this week’s NLJ.

Currently, most notes taken by judges in the course of proceedings are considered their private deliberations rather than the personal data of a party, he says. In July, however, the Ministry of Justice disclosed to a disgruntled claimant notes made by Judge Ian Pritchard-Witts on a constructive dismissal case, following a recommendation by the Information Commissioner on the reach of the Data Protection Act 1998.

Gold says: ‘The notes had been added to the court file and so formed part of the official record. Notes which go into the file in the first-tier tribunal and the employment tribunals, in view of the fact that no audio recording of the proceedings takes place there, are likely to be highly vulnerable to disclosure.’

Gold says future guidance is likely to pay particular attention to the status of notes made in digital case files and stored on IT equipment.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll