header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 164, Issue 7594

14 February 2014
IN THIS ISSUE

Ian Smith tackles a tricky employment law conundrum

Should defendants’ costs always be met by the claimants where proceedings are discontinued? Masood Ahmed & Ewen Archibald investigate

Ian Gascoigne & Hena Ninan discuss the outlook for commercial claims in 2014

MoJ proposals could “price claimants out of bringing a claim”

Court rejects union’s argument that tribunal fees are unlawful

House of Lords clarify shared parenting clause within Children and Familes Bill

Action "likely" after MoJ lays out response to consultation

ELA warning over HMRC plans to close tax avoidance loophole 

Nearly one in five solicitors works in-house

President of ULaw retires after 18 years

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
back-to-top-scroll