header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 158, Issue 7311

06 March 2008
IN THIS ISSUE

COMPETING RIGHTS
SCIENCE v FACTS
POST-DISCIPLINE SANCTIONS

A transatlantic adventure, by Geoffrey Bindman

Michael Zander argues for a delay in the national roll-out of police station legal advice changes

Malcolm Keen examines how a recent House of Lords ruling has affected occupational illness litigation

Will someone rid me of this meddlestone jury?Now the coroner's jury is under attack, says Julian Samiloff

R (ON THE APPLICATION OF M) v HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL

A proposed extension of the application of FIA 2000 raises questions both of principle and practice, says Charles Brasted

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll