header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 163, Issue 7545

24 January 2013
IN THIS ISSUE

Tenderenda v Polish Judicial Authority [2012] EWHC 3800 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 50 (Jan)

Arch Financial Products LLP and others v Financial Services Authority [2013] Lexis Citation 04, [2013] All ER (D) 67 (Jan)

Ellison v Cleghorn [2013] EWHC 5 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 49 (Jan)

Ronnie Fox studies the impact of regulation on legal fees

The pressure is on expert witnesses to swat up on hot tubbing, says Mark Solon

Geoffrey Bindman QC harks back to a trailblazing litigant in person

Recognising the finest achievements & talents of remarkable individuals & teams across the entire legal sector

Offspring of Gurkha veterans win landmark legal challenge

Funding slashed for legal advice support groups

Administrative oversight at HMCTS

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
back-to-top-scroll