header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 163, Issue 7545

24 January 2013
IN THIS ISSUE

Tenderenda v Polish Judicial Authority [2012] EWHC 3800 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 50 (Jan)

Arch Financial Products LLP and others v Financial Services Authority [2013] Lexis Citation 04, [2013] All ER (D) 67 (Jan)

Ellison v Cleghorn [2013] EWHC 5 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 49 (Jan)

Ronnie Fox studies the impact of regulation on legal fees

The pressure is on expert witnesses to swat up on hot tubbing, says Mark Solon

Geoffrey Bindman QC harks back to a trailblazing litigant in person

Recognising the finest achievements & talents of remarkable individuals & teams across the entire legal sector

Offspring of Gurkha veterans win landmark legal challenge

Funding slashed for legal advice support groups

Administrative oversight at HMCTS

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll