header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 167, Issue 7751

23 June 2017
IN THIS ISSUE

Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission T-210/15, [2017] All ER (D) 223 (Mar)

What can we learn from the new Civil Resolution Tribunal? Quite a lot, says Roger Smith

Alexander v Public Prosecutor’s Office, Marseille District Court of First Instance, France; Benedetto v Court of Palermo, Italy[2017] EWHC 1392 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 76 (Jun)

119 year service; clutter clearance & picking up litigation

Katherine Yap, chief executive of Maxwell Chambers, discusses Singapore’s role as an ADR hub & her expansion plans for chambers

Familiarisation does not breed contempt of court, but take care: the limits of permissible witness preparation are not as clear as they should be, caution James Holden & Thomas Wingfield

Clare Arthurs & Richard Marshall share an (almost) A-Z guide to civil evidence

R (on the application of MK (a child by her litigation friend CAE)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 1365 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 84 (Jun)

Critical for financial institutions that Brexit agenda covers passporting as soon as possible

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll