header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 161, Issue 7472

29 June 2011
IN THIS ISSUE

Dominic Regan dissects a turgid Bill to discover the essence of Jackson

Do not fear the Jackson juggernaut, say Rani Mina & Tom Duncan

Emma Williamson considers the impact of Wardle on the award of career-long loss compensation

David Burrows investigates the “gap procedures” under the new FPR

Robert Dickason examines exaggerated injuries & insurer misrepresentation claims

Lesley Hughes & Rachael Reynolds report on restrictive covenants & the power of the lands tribunal

How does a state protect the right to life, asks Sarah Lowe

Time waits for no man…but might make an exception for bugs, observe John Doherty & Stephen Hackett

Michael Tringham reviews some unusual probate tussles

Jane Mayfield reports on the proposed reforms to financial regulation

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll