header-logo header-logo

What has gone so badly wrong with budgeting, asks Dominic Regan

Dominic Regan shares his concern that proportionality, a major plank of the Jackson reforms, is so often sidelined

Freezing hourly rates may hinder access to justice, says Jon Lord

Dominic Vincent & James Whittaker discuss the delay to the introduction of the LASPO provisions for insolvency cases

The main opportunities for keeping arbitration costs down lie within three core areas, explains James Barrett

Dominic Regan reflects on the Jackson reforms

Patrick Allen counts the costs of the Jackson & legal aid reforms

What does the future hold for damages-based agreements, asks Francis Kendall

A phoney war or a £15bn headache for the government? Kerry Underwood counts down to the Coventry v Lawrence finale

Ed Pepperall QC provides an insider’s guide to the new look Part 36

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll