header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 161, Issue 7475

19 July 2011
IN THIS ISSUE

Halsbury's Law Exhange blogger Simon Hetherington on the inidividual liberty of terrorism suspects

Dominic Regan spills the beans on Jackson implementation (& beyond)

What’s the Human Rights Act ever done for us, asks Roger Smith

David Corker responds to the criminal cartel offence reform proposals

John McMullen considers if TUPE is alive & well

Does MK v CK mark a new start for child relocation, asks Jonathan Herring

Anthony Sullivan reviews the duties of motorists to pedestrians

Are pre-packs in the property industry a friend or foe, asks Siobhan Jones

Mark Johnson examines the impact of the controversial Health & Social Care Bill on charities & social enterprises

Craig Barlow & Aidan Briggs consider Bonhoeffer & hearsay evidence in disciplinary proceedings

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS
As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes
A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll