header-logo header-logo

Keith Davies examines the court’s approach to the right to protest on public land

Bring judicial review claims promptly, warns Nicholas Dobson

Charles Foster reports on a case that seeks to clarify best interests, in the best interests of clarity

Challenging a local authority on procedural grounds can prove difficult, as Tim Spencer-Lane reports

Does the “married couples only” rule count as direct or indirect discrimination asks Robert Wintemute

Resident parking: milking cash cows or lawful charging? Nicholas Dobson reports

Nicholas Dobson revisits the Highways Act regarding overlapping powers

...but some are more equal than others, say Janet Barlow & Rebecca Mason

Dominic Regan provides the fundamental guide to the new portals

Can we save the rule of law, asks Geoffrey Bindman QC

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll