header-logo header-logo

09 October 2024
Issue: 8089 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Law Society: scale back or withdraw over criminal legal aid

Criminal solicitors have been advised by their own professional body to consider quitting rather than ‘hanging on’ if they find criminal legal aid work financially unviable

The Law Society crossed the threshold this week into recommending firms stop waiting for a government decision on fees, review the viability of each part of their criminal practice and, if not viable, stop all or part of their police station and court work.

Last November, it issued a practice note advising solicitors on circumstances where they might refuse police station and court work—areas which received a 9% increase in fees rather than the minimum 15% recommended by the 2021 criminal legal aid independent review (CLAIR). In January, its judicial review against the government’s failure to implement CLAIR succeeded. The general election thwarted action on this, and the new government’s first budget is not until 30 October.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has now said it will announce its decision on fee rates in November—but has asked firms to tender before this for ten-year legal aid contracts due to start next year.

However, incoming Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘We can no longer ask firms to hold on in the hope of action from government that may never come.

‘We recommend firms examine the viability of each type of criminal legal aid work they undertake to decide if they should scale back or withdraw altogether until there is meaningful action by the new government.’

An MoJ spokesperson said: ‘The new government inherited a justice system under enormous strain and a criminal legal aid system facing significant challenges.

‘Criminal defence lawyers play an essential role in ensuring that justice is done. While any decision on future government funding is subject to the upcoming Spending Review, we are committed to working with the legal profession to support the sustainability of the market both now and in the future.’

Issue: 8089 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll