header-logo header-logo

New Law Journal | The leading weekly legal magazine

Home Login E-newsletter About us
Latest
Opinion
08 May 2026
Issue: 8160 / Categories: Legal News , Landlord&tenant , Housing , Property
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

249003
© Getty images

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

In NLJ this week, Bacon writes that the new Renters’ Rights regime dramatically reshapes the balance between landlords and tenants. Although section 21’s demise has been hailed as a tenant victory, he argues its repeal may actually simplify possession claims for landlords by removing technical traps surrounding deposits and gas safety rules.

At the same time, tenants gain stronger protections against rent increases and more opportunities to challenge landlords through tribunals. Bacon predicts those tribunals will become heavily congested because tenants now have little downside in disputing rent rises, potentially delaying increases for months. He also highlights the end of the notorious ‘AST trap’ affecting leaseholders and shared owners.

Overall, he sees ‘swings and roundabouts’: landlords gain broader possession grounds but face more uncertainty, bigger rent repayment risks and longer procedural delays.

FEATURES
The date-of-breach rule remains central to contractual damages, yet courts continue to recognise important exceptions: Ian Gascoigne explores the evolving case law
Liam Hurren reports on the legal & ethical risks highlighted by the recent Joe Donor case

Mark Pawlowski asks the unromantic question of who keeps the ring, and when, if a couple split

How many employment lawyers can dance on the head of a pin? Ian Smith weighs up the latest cases & celebrates the calm before the storm
Fewer cases, faster outcomes? James Tyler considers the future of enforcement at the Financial Conduct Authority
A recent decision has provided long-awaited clarity on how medical reporting organisations can fairly recover costs, writes Kris Kilsby
Natalie Quinlivan looks into limitation and unfair prejudice petitions after THG v Zedra and offers practical advice

The latest case involving a serial sperm donor serves to highlight the serious legal & ethical issues around unregulated donation, write Isabelle James & Lee Henderson

The rise of litigants in person: Clare Hughes-Williams sets out how to respond to this growing challenge
View All

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Payne Hicks Beach—Flora Hussey

Payne Hicks Beach—Flora Hussey

Private client department announces partner hire

Blake Morgan—Daniela Smith & Lee Fisher

Blake Morgan—Daniela Smith & Lee Fisher

Firm appoints first joint heads of Wales office

Ogier—Heidi Sandy & Farrah Sbaiti

Ogier—Heidi Sandy & Farrah Sbaiti

Global dispute resolution team promotes two partners in Guernsey and Cayman Islands

Meet our legal trainees
NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
MOST READ
  • An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
  • Could a Privy Council decision loosen the bonds which have tied down the tort of private nuisance for so long? Richard Buckley reports

  • Vanessa Friend & Robert Jackson examine Timokhin v Timokhina & the dangers of jurisdiction
  • A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
  • The rise of litigants in person: Clare Hughes-Williams sets out how to respond to this growing challenge
back-to-top-scroll