header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 163, Issue 7576

20 September 2013
IN THIS ISSUE

John McMullen investigates the changing landscape of collective redundancy law

If someone fails to buy land by the agreed date, when can the other party terminate the contract? Daniel Gatty reports

Nicholas Dobson revisits the Highways Act regarding overlapping powers

How far will warring couples go to secure jurisdiction, asks Anna Heenan

Interfish Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKUT 0336 (TCC), [2013] All ER (D) 22 (Sep)

Czarnecki v Choice Textiles Ltd UKEAT/0331/12/GE, [2013] All ER (D) 77 (Sep)

Re A (children) (jurisdiction: return of child) [2013] UKSC 60, [2013] All ER (D) 66 (Sep)

Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd and another company v The Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime [2013] EWHC 2734 (Comm), [2013] All ER (D) 96 (Sep)

Post-Mitchell, it’s time to take budgeting seriously, says Murray Heining

John O’Hare's 10-point guide to drafting a costs budget for the first CMC

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll