header-logo header-logo

Axiom Ince review lays blame on SRA

30 October 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Fraud
printer mail-detail

The Legal Services Board (LSB) has initiated enforcement action against the solicitors’ regulator over its handling of Axiom Ince Limited

Axiom Ince Limited closed in October 2023 with the loss of 1,400 jobs and approximately £60m client money missing. In November 2023, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) launched an investigation into the firm, arresting seven individuals in dawn raids across the South East of England.

An LSB-commissioned independent review by Northern Ireland firm Carson McDowell into the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) actions before it closed Axiom Ince has found the SRA ‘did not act adequately, effectively and efficiently’.

The review, published this week, concluded the SRA did not take all the steps it could or should have taken, and its ‘actions and omissions in this matter necessitate change in its procedures to mitigate the possibility of a similar situation arising again’.

Alan Kershaw, LSB chair, said: ‘The Axiom Ince case has caused significant consumer detriment.’

The LSB Board is now initiating the process to set directions under s 32 of the Legal Services Act 2007, requiring the SRA to make changes to better achieve its regulatory objectives.

However, Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘At the heart of this issue is a suspected complex and well-hidden fraud carried out by a solicitor, with an ongoing criminal investigation by the SFO.

‘The report recognises our “excellent work” in uncovering the suspected fraud. But there are things we could have done better. We moved quickly last year to tighten up some of our processes.

‘There is a lot in the report that we don’t agree with, and we don’t understand the basis for enforcement action. We will be consulting soon on changes to better protect clients’ money. This will include exploring the more radical solution of whether we should stop law firms holding client money.’

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘While the events leading to Axiom’s collapse were happening, the SRA was focused on increasing its fining powers and proposing regulatory expansion rather than tackling the known risks from accumulator style firms and ensuring its operations were joined up and laser focused on protecting consumers.’

Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Fraud
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quillon Law—Neil Dooley

Quillon Law—Neil Dooley

Disputes firm expands fraud and investigations practice with partner hire

Charles Russell Speechlys—Vadim Romanoff

Charles Russell Speechlys—Vadim Romanoff

Firm strengthens corporate tax and incentives team with partner hire

Burges Salmon—Gary Delderfield & Alec Bennett

Burges Salmon—Gary Delderfield & Alec Bennett

Partner and senior associate join pensions team

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
back-to-top-scroll