header-logo header-logo

30 October 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Axiom Ince review lays blame on SRA

The Legal Services Board (LSB) has initiated enforcement action against the solicitors’ regulator over its handling of Axiom Ince Limited

Axiom Ince Limited closed in October 2023 with the loss of 1,400 jobs and approximately £60m client money missing. In November 2023, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) launched an investigation into the firm, arresting seven individuals in dawn raids across the South East of England.

An LSB-commissioned independent review by Northern Ireland firm Carson McDowell into the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) actions before it closed Axiom Ince has found the SRA ‘did not act adequately, effectively and efficiently’.

The review, published this week, concluded the SRA did not take all the steps it could or should have taken, and its ‘actions and omissions in this matter necessitate change in its procedures to mitigate the possibility of a similar situation arising again’.

Alan Kershaw, LSB chair, said: ‘The Axiom Ince case has caused significant consumer detriment.’

The LSB Board is now initiating the process to set directions under s 32 of the Legal Services Act 2007, requiring the SRA to make changes to better achieve its regulatory objectives.

However, Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘At the heart of this issue is a suspected complex and well-hidden fraud carried out by a solicitor, with an ongoing criminal investigation by the SFO.

‘The report recognises our “excellent work” in uncovering the suspected fraud. But there are things we could have done better. We moved quickly last year to tighten up some of our processes.

‘There is a lot in the report that we don’t agree with, and we don’t understand the basis for enforcement action. We will be consulting soon on changes to better protect clients’ money. This will include exploring the more radical solution of whether we should stop law firms holding client money.’

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘While the events leading to Axiom’s collapse were happening, the SRA was focused on increasing its fining powers and proposing regulatory expansion rather than tackling the known risks from accumulator style firms and ensuring its operations were joined up and laser focused on protecting consumers.’

Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Fraud
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll